The Buffett Indicator Home Page

The Buffett Indicator is a financial metric that compares the total value of all publicly traded stocks in a country to that country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Named after Warren Buffett, one of the world’s most successful investors, the indicator is often used as a broad measure of market valuation.

The Buffett Indicator, also known as the Market Capitalization-to-GDP ratio, is a valuation tool used to determine whether the overall stock market is overvalued or undervalued at a specific time. Warren Buffett introduced this metric in 2001, describing it as “probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment.” In its current form, the indicator compares the market capitalization of the U.S. Wilshire 5000 index to the country’s GDP. This metric is closely monitored by the financial media as a key measure of U.S. market valuation, both in its absolute form and when adjusted for long-term trends.

The indicator is calculated by dividing the total market capitalization of a country’s stock market by its GDP.

This ratio gives a sense of how the stock market’s value compares to the size of the economy. When the market capitalization exceeds GDP by a significant margin, it might suggest that the stock market is overvalued. Conversely, when the market capitalization is below GDP, it could indicate that the market is undervalued.

Warren Buffett has pointed out that the indicator can serve as a broad measure of market sentiment and valuation. It’s particularly useful for identifying long-term trends in market valuation, rather than short-term movements. When the indicator is well above 100%, it may signal a bubble, as it suggests that stock prices are rising faster than the overall economy. When the indicator is below 100%, it may suggest that stocks are relatively cheap in comparison to the GDP.

While the Buffett Indicator provides valuable insight, it isn’t a perfect measure. Different countries and markets can vary significantly in terms of the composition of their economies and stock markets. For example, countries with a higher proportion of private companies might show a lower Buffett Indicator ratio, while countries with large public sectors may display a higher ratio. Additionally, changes in interest rates, inflation, and other economic factors can also influence the indicator’s readings.

Buffett acknowledged that his metric was a simple one and thus had “limitations,” yet the theoretical foundation of the indicator, particularly for the U.S. market, is widely regarded as sound.

For instance, studies have demonstrated a strong and consistent annual correlation between U.S. GDP growth and the growth of U.S. corporate profits, a relationship that has become even more pronounced since the Great Recession of 2007–2009. GDP effectively captures scenarios where certain industries experience significant margin increases while accounting for reduced wages and costs that may compress margins in other sectors.

While the Buffett Indicator has been calculated for many international stock markets, it comes with caveats. Other markets often have less stable compositions of publicly listed companies (e.g., Saudi Arabia’s metric was significantly impacted by the 2018 listing of Aramco) or vastly different ratios of private to public firms (e.g., Germany vs. Switzerland). As a result, using the indicator for cross-market comparisons of valuation is generally not advisable.

On December 10, 2001, Warren Buffett introduced this metric in a Fortune essay co-authored with journalist Carol Loomis. In the essay, Buffett shared a chart spanning 80 years, illustrating the value of all publicly traded securities in the U.S. as a percentage of the country’s Gross National Product (GNP). Buffett referred to the metric as “probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment,” noting that nearly two years prior, the ratio had reached an unprecedented level—something he suggested should have served as a significant warning signal.

Buffett explained that for the annual return on U.S. securities to significantly outpace the annual growth of U.S. GNP over an extended period: “you would need the line to go straight off the top of the chart. That won’t happen.” He concluded the essay by indicating the thresholds he considered indicative of favorable or risky times to invest: “If the percentage falls to the 70% or 80% range, buying stocks is likely to work out very well. If the ratio nears 200%—as it did in 1999 and part of 2000—you are playing with fire.”

Since then, Buffett’s metric has been widely recognized as the “Buffett Indicator” and continues to garner significant attention in the financial media and modern finance textbooks.

The low levels seen in 2009 would have been considered average during the period from 1950 to 1995. Several explanations have been proposed for this upward trend. One suggestion is that GDP may not fully account for the overseas profits of U.S. multinational corporations, especially those using tax havens or complex tax structures, such as major technology and life sciences companies. Additionally, the structural increase in the profitability of U.S. companies, possibly driven by the growing dominance of tech companies, could justify a higher ratio, although this trend could reverse over time. Some commentators also point out that the Buffett Indicator doesn’t account for corporate debt, which might also influence the readings.

We built this real-time indicator fuelled by Quarter Pounders and Coca Cola.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be financial, investment, or professional advice. We do not provide personalized investment recommendations or endorsements. The value of US stocks and other investments can fluctuate, and past performance is not indicative of future results. You should seek the advice of a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. By using this website, you acknowledge and agree that we are not responsible for any losses or damages arising from your reliance on any information provided herein.